For Christmas I got an interesting present from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, sitiosecuador.com and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, accc.rcec.sinica.edu.tw including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to expand his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' content on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out markets on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide range of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, forum.altaycoins.com firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector kenpoguy.com to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and forums.cgb.designknights.com even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.