The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous stars were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites offering both complimentary casino-style games and profitable prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to mention lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as conventional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company deals with allegations of prohibited gambling in a New York lawsuit that declares VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's statement below)

'I'm uncertain" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences in between traditional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - video games are totally free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads generally center around the social element of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure clients with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The disparity between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting totally free.

'Most social sweeps consumers never make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social gambling establishments use clients a possibility to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the option to buy valueless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to unlock various features within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting consumers to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad flaunting Drake's cars, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all but 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, thereby providing a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of casino games for a possibility to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are just a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important distinction in between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting sites like casinos.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that use them the possibility to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself doesn't fulfill the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of everyday companies in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous sports betting market insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, generally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the normal payout portion for a momentary promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the profits made by the company [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar facilities have given that been shuttered over claims of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among a number of celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments should face similar examination.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state lawyer generals as key consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in fact a guise for illegal gambling.'

One of the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are forgoing considerable tax and earnings opportunities as this gambling changes that conducted through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent lawsuit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming business. '

Apple and Google have actually also been called as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We typically don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games across most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not only terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, but also guaranteeing this is done safely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably common across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to vigorously safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns in between standard online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show problematic for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues want to project a strong position against prohibited gambling - specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives responded to DailyMail.com's requests for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to describe to consumers the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious unlawful gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton